Presenting the KFF Secret Decoder Ring…

by on June 20, 2012

Secret Decoder Ring

I used to love playing with secret decoder rings when I was a kid. They would come in cereal boxes and I fancied myself quite the spy, able to decipher all kinds of “secret messages” that my friends and I would make up and pass around to each other.

Well, like most seemingly useless things you learn in life, it all comes back around, and today I often find myself wishing I had a “secret decoder ring” for much of the economic and financial gibberish that comes out of the mouths of our fearless leaders and press.

QE? Operation Twist? LTRO? Target 2? Yield Curve? Say What?

Hmmm….if only I had a secret decoder ring…

After searching high and low for one all over the Internet and coming up empty, I decided to create my own…our very first Kung Fu Finance secret decoder ring.

And what better place to start with than with the gibberish that came out of the U.S. Federal Reserve today.   :)

Today the “big news” here in America was the Federal Reserve’s statement from their latest meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). (The secret decoder ring is twitching already with just that one sentence!)

If you’re a glutton for punishment, you can read the full text of their statement here, but let me hit the highlights and see if we can decipher what’s really going on:

First, the Federal Funds Rate:

“…the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent…”

Well that’s clear as mud, unless you are a classically trained economist, so let’s see if our awesome secret decoder ring can help:

First, what on earth do they mean by “highly accommodative”?

Luckily this one’s easy for our magic little ring to decipher…

“Highly accommodative” translates to:

  • “easy money” (for the banks)
  • “very low interest rates” (for the banks, the government, and for us savers)
  • “more money printing” (devaluation of the dollar)

All those are synonyms for “highly accommodative”.

But since I know you are very smart and savvy, I bet you’ve picked up on the key question here that remains…

Just who exactly is being accommodated by this “easy monetary” policy?

You? Me? Senior citizens and those on fixed incomes who could certainly use some help?

Unfortunately, no…

Let’s use our secret decoder ring…

Answer: the banks and large financial institutions, who will continue to be able to borrow money from the Fed at 0% interest rates and immediately make a positive spread…the very definition of “easy money”.

(Let me know if you want me to decode “positive spread”.)

I wish we could borrow money at 0%!  We would quickly become billionaires!

Moving on, we have…

“…and currently anticipates that economic conditions–including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run–are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.”

Secret Decoder Ring Translation:

And banks will be able to sit on this money and make a positive spread for at least another 18 months…

Not bad at all (as long as you’re a bank!).

(If you’d like a little background on the Federal Funds Target Rate and how it works, I answered a question about it in a QnA here, and my friend and fellow La Estancia owner Gary Kinghorn provided a little more info. here).

Next, we have the extension of “Operation Twist”:

Operation Twist is the cutely named (hah) program for the Federal Reserve purchases of “government securities” (aka “U.S. Treasury Bonds”). This is the main way in which the Fed is able to reduce the federal funds target interest rate mentioned above—they increase the money supply by writing bad checks to the government.

(I’m not joking…that’s honestly how it works, and if that doesn’t make sense to you because you are a normal person, :)  I wrote about that process here.)

So what does their newly issued statement say?

“The Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities. Specifically, the Committee intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less. This continuation of the maturity extension program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative.”

Secret Decoder Ring Translation:

The Fed is trading its short-term bonds (those in the 1 – 3 year range) for longer-term bonds (those in the 6 – 30 year range). Basically, they are pushing the yield on long-term bonds down (the interest rate) to encourage borrowing/lending (and to benefit the government who would have a difficult time making interest payments at a higher rate).

They have been doing this since September, but it was scheduled to end at the end of this month. However, now they are extending this “program” until the end of the year.

So what does all this mean for you?

They left the door wide open for more “QE” (money-printing), which suggests that gold (and other hard assets) will continue to do well over time.

I hope the secret decoder ring helped…please let me know if you have any questions (and whether you think the Fed did the right thing or not…) in the comments!

To your financial success,

— Kung Fu Girl

Print Friendly

About the Author:

Susan Fujii, aka , is an SEC Accredited Investor who believes that anyone can learn to be financially independent.

Susan has authored 199 posts on Kung Fu Finance, and you can connect with her on .

Want to master your finances? Join us now.

Why don't you join our community on your journey to financial mastery.
Sign up below for the FREE Kung Fu Finance newsletter.

Leave a comment!

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Steve June 20, 2012 at 6:48 pm

Dear KF Girl,

Your insight, writings, thoughts are outstanding, Thank you, I know the knowledge didn’t come easy, and the continued building on this theme is monumentous.

Your article points, at least for me my opinon and position of being short long term bonds. I am a little early in my investment and don’t know if I can hold out as long as the Feds and continue the charade. I am short bonds via a the longest long term option I can find. Options because of the leverage, I don’t have enough to buy enough shares of the stock to make the potential big gain.

The Central banks are the gift that keep on giving depending on which position one takes. I am amazed at how much money keeps moving into the bond markets and out of equities. I figured operation twist would be extended, and would expect that it will continue it’s course in the future.

I hope that I can roll over my long term leap options around the end to the year without to much of a downside cost. We will see.

I figure if I set a figure going forward for the next 5 years and can maintain a position that eventually it will pay out very well.

It is a speculative position, I feel I have 3 aces and hope to draw the 4th.

It is not a large position, money I can afford to lose who knows.

Steve

Reply

kungfugirl June 22, 2012 at 8:26 am

Hi Steve!

I think that’s a great speculation, although you are right in wondering about the timing– shorting long bonds will be the trade of the century…at some point. The trick is identifying exactly when (and not going broke before then while waiting– never underestimate the power of politicians to delay, deny, and procrastinate, LOL).

My only advice is to be cautious in the near-term, because the insanity to come is truly unparalleled. Heck, we could even see negative yields, like in Germany, before the bubble finally pops. So just be careful. But I’m with you…it’s the biggest bubble in the world right now!

Thanks so much for your comment and insight, and good luck (and please keep us posted!). It’s always so great hearing from you!

– KFG

Reply

amojsoski June 20, 2012 at 8:19 pm

Very interesting article of Mark Spitznagel on who benefits http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304356604577343430113336486.html

Reply

kungfugirl June 22, 2012 at 8:51 am

Thank you Amojsoski!

Yes, outstanding article. You unfortunately must be a WSJ subscriber to view, but here are a few of my favorite parts (hopefully WSJ won’t mind a few quotes since we gave ‘em a link…):

“The Fed doesn’t expand the money supply by uniformly dropping cash from helicopters over the hapless masses. Rather, it directs capital transfers to the largest banks (whether by overpaying them for their financial assets or by lending to them on the cheap), minimizes their borrowing costs, and lowers their reserve requirements. All of these actions result in immediate handouts to the financial elite first, with the hope that they will subsequently unleash this fresh capital onto the unsuspecting markets, raising demand and prices wherever they do.”

and…

“The Fed, having gone on an unprecedented credit expansion spree, has benefited the recipients who were first in line at the trough: banks (imagine borrowing for free and then buying up assets that you know the Fed is aggressively buying with you) and those favored entities and individuals deemed most creditworthy. Flush with capital, these recipients have proceeded to bid up the prices of assets and resources, while everyone else has watched their purchasing power decline.”

That pretty much sums it up!

Thanks for the great link!
– KFG

Reply

Tutu June 22, 2012 at 5:28 pm

Aloha, KFG!

As a government employee I’ve had many benefits with memberhsip in our professional FCU–better interests for “Rainy Day” savings, higher dividends for CDs, lower interest rates for loans, free checking, other perks like free traveler’s checks, notary service, annual gifts or prizes, scholarships, and free or partially free food at banquets (almost 50% off cost of a hotel dinner and entertainment). How do they compete or compare with the banks or other financial institutions? In recent years the FCUs have extended their growing memberships to those not in their professional communities. How are they able to offer so much more than the banks? Do you have information about the strength, benefits, and longevity of FCUs or any cautions for seniors to beware of? Mahalo for this expedient and generous service where some of us are able to receive “armchair” education instead of having to attend costly seminars or classes like energetic aunties. I appreciate your kind consideration of my questions.

Hugs from East Honolulu,
Tutu

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: