Conspiracy Theory Thursday (What Is Money? Part 2)

by on February 9, 2012

Damn It Feels Good to Be A Banksta

It’s been awhile since I’ve written a juicy “Conspiracy Theory Thursday” post, so it must be time for another one…

We left off with our story of money earlier this week with people having progressed from using coins made of precious metals to using receipts for these metals. Precious metal coins were wonderful, but they had two major problems:

  1. They were heavy and cumbersome to lug around in any sort of quantity from home to merchant, and
  2. You had to guard them at all times to protect them from thieves

(We’ll set aside the third problem for the moment of unscrupulous governments, merchants, and buyers scraping or “clipping” bits of gold or silver from the coins thus decreasing their worth…that’s a story of “debasement” for later!)

With the first “banks”, these two problems were solved; people could safely store their precious metal coins at a safe vault guarded by a trusted member of the community (usually a gold or silver smith who already had a vault of his own and was accustomed to safeguarding his own metals) and receive a receipt for how much money they had stored.

When purchasing something, the buyer simply handed the seller his receipt and the seller deposited the receipt at his own “bank”. The seller’s “bank” then talked to the purchaser’s “bank” and they each made the appropriate entries in their books to reconcile the transaction.

This worked swimmingly for years, but eventually these banks noticed that they had a lot of gold and silver piling up in their vaults as more and more trade was conducted. They quickly realized that most people didn’t actually need to withdraw the metals very often, and decided that they could make more money by lending out these precious metals rather than by storing them.

Which brings us to…

Fractional Reserve Banking

Let me briefly tell you what fractional reserve banking is, and then we’ll get into what I think is the more interesting question…is it evil and nefarious or perfectly legitimate?

Supposing for the moment that it’s a perfectly fine practice, let’s take a look at how it works:

Our “bankers” from our example above, upon noticing that fully 85 – 90% of the coins remained in the vault at all times with only 10-15% being used in commerce, decided that the remaining coins ought to be “put to work” rather than sitting idly in the vaults collecting dust.
The bankers then decided to lend out these coins to borrowers, and earn interest income on the coins that would otherwise just be collecting dust.

So, let’s take a look at an example:

You deposit 100 coins at your bank. Your banker says “thank you very much”, hands you a receipt for your 100 coins (say for $100, $1 per coin), and promptly looks around for someone to make a 90 coin loan to, knowing it is highly unlikely that you will return tomorrow and demand all 100 of your coins back.

He finds John, the cobbler, who wants to expand his shoe-making business but needs 90 coins to purchase enough leather to make a lot of shoes. Your banker issues John 90 of your coins, knowing you “most likely” will not need them yourself. John, however, does not want to lug around and safeguard 90 gold coins himself, so he just keeps them at the bank and instead gets a receipt for the 90 coins, a $90 receipt.

That simple explanation is really the heart of fractional reserve banking. Do you see what just happened? Your banker has become a magician and has “magically” created $90 worth of money out of thin air (or rather, out of DEBT).

Now there are two receipts out there, one for $100 and one for $90, both backed by the same 100 gold coins in your bank. Therefore the same coins that were once $1 per coin are now effectively only worth 52.6 cents each. The coins backing the receipts is now only worth a fraction of the face value of the receipts, so these receipts became known as “fractional money” and the process by which they were created is called “fractional reserve banking”.

Let’s see what happens next…John takes his $90 receipt and gives it to the leather man, Steve, to buy the leather to make his shoes. Steve takes the $90 receipt and deposits it at his bank.

Steve’s bank talks to John’s bank and they make the appropriate entries in their books… the 90 coins are “transferred” from John’s bank to Steve’s bank and everyone is happy.

You haven’t asked for your coins back yet, John is happily making his leather shoes and paying off his loan to your bank, and Steve is the proud new owner of 90 shiny coins (well, his bank is…he has a receipt for $90 from his bank that shows that the bank owes him 90 coins).

Now at this point you would think that your and John’s bank would be sweating it a little (I would be, but then, I am honest…) but lo and behold, your bank is happy—it still owns 10 coins and is comfortable in the fact that you will “most likely” not want your 100 coins back (at most you’ll ever want 10), and John is busily paying interest on his loan so the bank is making money.

And now Steve’s bank gets into the action…it has 90 new coins just begging to be loaned out to a prospective borrower! Steve’s bank “knows” it can loan 90% of those 90 coins out to a borrower without Steve being bothered in the slightest. So Steve’s bank makes a loan to Sara for 81 coins to help her start her new bakery.

Magic money!

Now there are three receipts in circulation for the same 100 coins:

  1. Your original receipt for $100
  2. Steve’s receipt for $90 (this was originally John’s, but he gave it to Steve in exchange for leather)
  3. Sara’s receipt for $81

Now the value of the original 100 coins has been reduced again…If my shaky old math skills work correctly each coin is now worth 100 coins / ($100 + $90 + $81 receipts) = $0.37 per coin.

This lovely little process continues until either:

  1. The bank runs out of money to loan (90% of smaller and smaller amounts eventually reaches 0…72.90, 65.61, 59.05, 53.15, 47.83, 43.04, etc.), or
  2. You (or Steve or someone along the way) decide that you want your coins back

Fractional Reserve Banking Today

This is still how fractional reserve banking works today, except thanks to President Nixon in 1971, our U.S. dollars (“receipts”) are no longer backed by anything of value. You cannot exchange your dollars for gold or silver…Nixon took that ability away on August 15, 1971, and ever since then the U.S. dollar has been backed by nothing other than “the full faith and credit of the United States Government”.

I’ll let you draw your own conclusions as to whether that’s worth anything or not!

Now that you know what fractional reserve banking is, you have a decision to make:

Is it evil and nefarious, or perfectly legitimate?

Some historical accounts portray it as evil and nefarious, saying that bankers broke the original contract between the depositor and the bank, and that the precious metals stored at the bank weren’t truly available to lend. They further state that sharing the interest income from the loans with the original depositors was never part of the plan (and we all know that banks currently pay us less than 1% on our deposits and yet charge borrowers upwards of 4 and 5% for a home and dramatically more for credit cards!) and that bankers only did so after the depositors became outraged at learning this was happening (the depositors had naively thought that the bankers were lending the bankers’ own money, not that of the depositors).

However, other historical accounts (and all mainstream news media today…) remove the “nefarious” angle and simply state that the bankers decided that the money ought to be “put to work” rather than sitting idly in vaults “collecting dust”, and that more money expands economic opportunity for everyone.

We will return to this question next week with a deeper look at both sides, but for now, what do you think about fractional reserve banking? Evil and nefarious or good for society?

To your financial success,

— Kung Fu Girl

Print Friendly

About the Author:

Susan Fujii, aka , is an SEC Accredited Investor who believes that anyone can learn to be financially independent.

Susan has authored 199 posts on Kung Fu Finance, and you can connect with her on .

Want to master your finances? Join us now.

Why don't you join our community on your journey to financial mastery.
Sign up below for the FREE Kung Fu Finance newsletter.

Leave a comment!

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

Honolulu Aunty February 9, 2012 at 4:51 pm

KFG,

That was an AWESOME explanation of fractional reserve banking! I kept hearing the term and the banks’ ability to lend out $10 for every $1 on deposit – but I never really understood the practice until this post!

What do I think of it? I like it, and I don’t like it, at the same time.

The saying “He who owns the gold controls the world” was true in the old days. Not too many people had enough gold to sit on and so the wealth was not spread around. It was, though, a very “honest” kind of wealth – based on what you physically owned.

It would have been a struggle to advance, but hard work, diligence, a lucky break, and more hard work was the order of the day to go from middle class to wealthy. And it would have taken a lot of time and energy.

With fractional reserve banking practices, money is worth nothing, and it is much much more plentiful, so there is more to spread around and thus more people can grab what they can.

I believe because of that “evil and nefarious” type of banking, it is easier to become wealthy. Banks can loan to many more people for just their signature (though it gotten tightened up lately) or collateralized assets. It gave all of us more opportunity to grow our wealth.

On the gold standard, we are limited to a finite (and honest) supply. On the current good faith standard, we are unlimited to infinite money out of thin air (magic).

My ideal situation would be to have a hunk of gold for the just-in-case and use the magic money to get more magic money, as much as I can, as fast as I can that will put out more and more profits and cash flow on a regular and ongoing basis. Then I can afford to buy a few more hunks of gold (or silver) that I can sit on.

The big dark cloud is when and how the fractional reserve banking and our good faith currencies will fail. For those with a lot of gold and silver, the end is viewed with almost gleeful anticipation. For the rest, it can be disastrous.

I try to learn as much as I can of the useful stuff and not get ripped off, so I thank you KFG for sharing your knowledge and expertise with us here for zero grams of gold and zero dollars of worthless paper.

Your good karma grows each day!

Reply

Steve February 9, 2012 at 5:32 pm

KF Girl,

Great explanation!

I won’t say it is evil or not, it is definately crooked.

It works well as long as the economy continues to expand, but look out with a depression, ahhhh….. people show up and want their 100 pieces of gold back, but hey- what happened a 100 people showed up before you and got their gold back, the bank closed down, a bit of a holiday, come back tomorrow, or next week, in the mean time you can’t eat or pay your bills.

A bank run?

The premis is that the depositors won’t want all their money back all at the same time.

Now that we aren’t on a gold standard but a fiat standard and bank run would institute and Bank Holiday to give the federal reserve under the guise of the treasury department, time to print the money to cover the withdrawls, the problem may arise that the system can’t borrow the billions of dollars needed because it doesn’t exist. It never did.

A black swan event would feed on itself as people couldn’t withdraw their savings.

This is the problem of fiat money, it is all about confidence in the lender, and the central bank to provide, and the confidence of the governments ability to provide.

When the system fails it is main street that loses, and that is when chaos breaks out. At that point all the government can do is cover their butt, with Martial law and abandonment of the constitution, and force to control the masses.

It is not a good thing.

Steve

Reply

Willis February 9, 2012 at 5:38 pm

What a fantastic post KFG. I’ve heard of this concept numerous times but you nailed this section into my head with the down to earth explanation.

One question – does the new currency created using FRB ever contract? Doesn’t the monetary base just keep on expanding if all the banks keep doing FRB, i.e. our currency keeps devaluing.

Reply

Honolulu Aunty February 9, 2012 at 6:05 pm

That’s a great question Willis! It made all the wheels in my head start turning and thinking.

I would think the currency from FRB contracts when people pay down their loans (IF they pay down their loans), but sometimes the interest on the loans is more than the principal portion. So the bank makes oodles and oodles of money on interest since the amount due to the bank is much much more than what they started with.

So if the currency does contract, the banks don’t make as much on interest.

My subsequent question would be why the banks have gotten so hard to borrow from in the last couple of years.

Reply

Gilbert February 10, 2012 at 3:40 pm

Hi KFG,

You’ve talked about debasing our paper money. But I’ve been searching for eternity on how inflation happens. No one can probably explain inflation in such a simple manner as you explained fractional reserve banking. Please enlighten us about this.

Reply

kungfugirl February 16, 2012 at 11:25 am

Hi Gilbert!

You are so sweet; I’m happy to talk about inflation. I actually wrote a post on this awhile back here:

But I only talked about the cause of inflation for a few sentences there, so I can definitely spend some more time on it in a full-fledged post.

Thank you so much for your nice comment!
– KFG

Reply

mark maimone June 19, 2012 at 6:09 am

i have been looking around for any theorys about a separate but equally legal tender dual monitary system that allows the buyers (workers) to purchase goods/services only by the true value of precious metals and energy commodities, from the producers/sellers (businesses,corperations, wall street) who would only use the fiat monitary system? this “may” give the buyers a higher purchasing ability, and produce a strong demand on goods, and services produced? that would have to assume that the dollar number amount would (over time) equal the dollar number amount in the new currency. say if done immediately $1500 dollars (paycheck) fiat would equal say $15,000 (equivilant to the fiat) IN the new currency if the buyer had $1500 of “true value” of the new currency on his monthly paycheck? it would also assume two prices for a product say $25,000 in fiat = $2500 in new currency. if this were “possible” would it not help both the buyer,(consumer) and the (seller), corperations,businesses, and wall street? or would this type of monitary system be bad for both? or a mutually destructive theory? thank you for your response and time!

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 6 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: